Chapter 4: Clean and Safe Seas
We are making good progress towards our vision of clean and safe seas. The open seas are still little affected by pollution, and improved regulation and practices have reduced the inputs of a range of contaminants. Most problems are local in nature, particularly in industrialised estuaries and coasts, and generally associated with historic discharges and emissions from industry and agriculture. However, we are still finding man-made chemicals in environmental samples, and need to keep gathering data to assess their potential impacts and the need for further controls. Litter is still found on all beaches that we have monitored, and we do not yet have the capacity to assess the levels and impacts of underwater noise and litter in the sea and on the sea floor.
Key findings
- The open seas are still little affected by pollution and levels of monitored contaminants continue to fall, albeit slowly in many cases. This reflects reductions in riverine inputs of a range of contaminants and in atmospheric deposition of some heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to UK seas. However, a range of persistent chemicals appear in deep-sea fish and marine mammals off UK coasts, and we have also found litter at a depth of 1000 metres.
- New data show that the five areas assessed in the previous UK-wide assessment (Charting Progress) as being of concern from nutrient inputs (East England, East Anglia, Liverpool Bay, Solent, Firth of Clyde) do not suffer from eutrophication. However, we have identified 17 small harbours and estuaries that are problem areas for eutrophication. Measures are in place to control these but recovery is likely to be slow.
- Further regulation preventing the use of tributyltin-based antifouling paints on large seagoing vessels has led to a fall in the development of male characteristics in female dogwhelks in some areas.
- Levels of several flame retardant compounds are declining in porpoise blubber, following EU regulatory action and as a result of improvements in industry practice. However, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are present at levels that affect harbour porpoises around the UK, probably by suppressing their immune systems and making them more prone to death from infectious diseases. Levels are declining only slowly, despite a ban on these chemicals in the 1980s.
- Where there are problems, these usually occur in localised areas near the source rather than across whole regions. However, some substances travel long distances through the atmosphere and have been detected in fish offshore and some become concentrated as they pass through the food chain to accumulate in cetaceans.
- Some ‘legacy’ contaminants are present at high concentrations in estuaries historically contaminated by industrial processes. For example, in the northeast of England, PAHs are present in sediments at concentrations which may be toxic to organisms living in or on the seabed, and may take many tens to hundreds of years to degrade.
- There have been no major marine oil or chemical spills in UK waters since the publication of Charting Progress. Levels of oil in produced water discharged by the offshore oil and gas industry are falling in response to regulatory controls. Doses of radioactivity received by people and wildlife continue to be well within regulatory limits. Work is underway at Sellafield and Dounreay to retrieve radioactive particles from the beaches; the levels are not high enough for the beaches to be closed, but harvesting of seafood around Dounreay is currently banned.
- For algal toxins, only 0.3% to 1% of the roughly 1000 samples analysed annually give positive results, and even these are often not above regulatory limits. Controls are in place to prevent harvesting of shellfish contaminated to a level that would pose a risk to human consumers.
- We found microbiological contamination of coastal waters in some localised areas in both bathing waters and shellfish growing waters, although inputs from sewage treatment plants have fallen significantly because of investments in infrastructure. Shellfish harvested from contaminated areas are treated prior to sale to reduce microbiological contamination to safe levels.
Improvements in assessment methodology
We have increased monitoring coverage since Charting Progress through more efficient use of ships, and the use of novel technologies such as remote sensing, smart buoys and ferry boxes.
Gaps in knowledge
Although we have good information on the number of small oil spills around the UK, assessing the cumulative impact of a large number of small spills is problematic and poorly understood.
We do not have an accurate picture of the extent of litter in the sea or of its impacts. Microplastics are thought to be widespread in sediments around UK coasts. These may have physical impacts on the environment and may also adsorb contaminants and deliver them into food chains. As yet we do not know either the scale or potential consequences of these effects.
Certain algal blooms that occur naturally in UK waters could generate toxins such as azaspiracids and spirolides and those responsible for Neurotoxic Shellfish Poisoning. These toxins are not included in current monitoring programmes, and we need to know more about the risks they pose in order to decide whether they should be monitored in the future.
We identified potential impacts from underwater noise from a variety of sources, including seismic surveys undertaken by the oil and gas industry, the use of sonars, and the construction of offshore wind farms. However, we need more research and monitoring to understand the scale of these impacts.
Although we know a great deal about the effects of many single substances, there are some, such as pharmaceuticals, where we need more information. Also, we understand little about the cumulative effects of simultaneous exposure to a variety of chemicals.
Summary map
The summary map displays the status and trends of the clean and safe seas components of the eight regions. For further details see the Chapter 4 summary table and for further information on how ‘traffic light status’ and trend arrows have been assigned see Communicating the findings.

